Free Interactive Tool

The Kinetic Quotient

A NEAT performance dashboard that monitors sedentary decay, delivers smart break reminders, and scores your daily metabolic and cognitive hygiene.

Built on Mayo Clinic NEAT research • Ekelund/Lancet mortality data • NASA cognitive studies • 100% private

Launch Dashboard ↓

Kinetic Quotient Dashboard

Track your work sessions, get evidence-based break reminders, and optimize your NEAT score.All data stays on your device — 100% private.

⏱️

Track Sessions

Real-time monitoring of active work time and sedentary periods.

🔔

Smart Reminders

Break notifications timed to your natural pauses, not arbitrary clocks.

📊

NEAT Score

Daily 0-100 score based on break frequency, quality, and metabolic timing.

🔥

Streaks

Build consecutive day chains. Score 70+ to keep your streak alive.

Get NEAT Optimization Protocols

Weekly movement snack routines, ergonomic research, and productivity hacks for knowledge workers.

The Science of Sedentary Decay: Why Your Chair Is Your Most Dangerous Tool

The knowledge economy creates a fundamental biological paradox: the cognitive demands of high-performance roles — algorithmic trading, software engineering, strategic analysis — require sustained attention, yet the physical environment necessitated by these roles actively degrades the physiological substrate required to maintain that attention. This phenomenon, known as Sedentary Decay, is not merely the absence of movement but a distinct, active pathological state characterized by rapid metabolic downregulation and cognitive erosion.

What Is NEAT? (Non-Exercise Activity Thermogenesis)

Formalized by Dr. James Levine of the Mayo Clinic, NEAT represents the energy expenditure of all physical activities other than volitional exercise, sleeping, or eating. This includes walking, typing, fidgeting, and maintaining posture. Levine's research identified NEAT as the most variable component of Total Daily Energy Expenditure — varying by up to 2,000 kcal per day between individuals.

Metabolic Stratification of Office Behaviors (Levine et al.)

Sitting Motionless+4%
~80 kcal/hr
Standing Motionless+13%
~88 kcal/hr
Fidgeting (Seated)+54%
~120 kcal/hr
Fidgeting (Standing)+94%
~150 kcal/hr
Walking (1 mph)+154%
~200 kcal/hr
Walking (2 mph)+202%
~235 kcal/hr
Walking (3 mph)+292%
~305 kcal/hr

Baseline: supine rest at ~1.29 kcal/min. All figures for a 76kg adult. Source: Levine et al., indirect calorimetry.

The critical insight: over a 10-hour workday, the cumulative difference between a sedentary worker (sitting motionless) and a NEAT-optimized worker (incorporating standing, fidgeting, and hourly strolls) can exceed 800-1,000 kcal — equivalent to running approximately 8 miles, without the perceived exertion or fatigue.

The Ekelund Meta-Analysis: Sitting and Mortality Risk

The definitive analysis comes from Ekelund et al. (The Lancet, 2016), analyzing over 1 million individuals. The data reveals that sitting for more than 8 hours per day increases all-cause mortality risk by 59% for those with low physical activity. However, 60-75 minutes of daily moderate activity can eliminate this excess risk — the hazard ratio for the most active quartile sitting 8+ hours was only 1.04 (not significant).

This underscores the "Active Couch Potato" paradox: standard gym exercise (30 min/day) does not fully negate the metabolic harms of excessive sitting. Only very high levels of activity achieve this. The practical solution is a "whole-day" approach where NEAT and structured exercise are complementary, not interchangeable.

The LPL Cascade: What Happens When You Sit

Prolonged sitting triggers a rapid physiological cascade that researchers call "inactivity physiology." Lipoprotein Lipase (LPL) — the rate-limiting enzyme responsible for clearing blood triglycerides — drops by 90-95% within hours of inactivity. This local suppression is tied to the electromyographic silence of postural muscles and is not fully reversed by a single bout of vigorous exercise later in the day.

Simultaneously, insulin sensitivity degrades. Uninterrupted sitting results in postprandial glucose excursions 24-30% higher than conditions where sitting is interrupted by 2-minute light walking bouts every 20 minutes. This transforms the post-lunch period into metabolic toxicity — hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia that directly impair prefrontal cortex function.

Cognitive Performance: The DeskTime Discovery

The Draugiem Group's analysis of DeskTime data — tracking millions of productivity logs — found that the top 10% most productive workers didn't work longer hours. They worked in natural rhythms of approximately 52 minutes of focus followed by 17 minutes of break. This ~3:1 work-to-rest ratio aligns with the brain's ultradian Basic Rest-Activity Cycles (BRAC) of 90-120 minutes.

The neuroscience explains why: during sustained attention, the Default Mode Network (DMN) — normally suppressed during focused work — begins to "leak" into the Task-Positive Network. This manifests as daydreaming and errors. Strategic breaks allow the DMN to reactivate intentionally, replenishing attentional resources before they are forcefully depleted. NASA research confirms that light pedaling at 30% max effort significantly improves reaction times on cognitive tasks — a "neutral-positive" intervention that maintains arousal without consuming attentional bandwidth.

Movement Snacks: The Glucose Blunting Effect

Peddie et al. demonstrated that breaking sitting with just 1 minute 40 seconds of walking every 30 minutes was superior to a single 30-minute continuous walk for controlling postprandial glucose and insulin. Contracting muscles uptake glucose via insulin-independent pathways, effectively blunting the sugar spike before it requires a massive insulin response. This is why our dashboard applies a 1.5x "Lunch Multiplier" to breaks taken between 12-2 PM — when the metabolic payoff is greatest.

For Traders: Decision Quality Potential

Trading requires high-level executive function and emotional regulation — both of which degrade with glucose depletion and cognitive fatigue. Research in financial decision-making shows that "Time on Task" correlates with increased error rates and the use of heuristic shortcuts. As neural resources deplete, traders are more likely to impulse trade or ignore risk parameters.

Our Decision Quality Potential (DQP) metric — available in Trader Mode — models this decay in real time. Starting at 100%, it degrades by 1% per minute of continuous sitting. When it hits the Red Zone (<60%), the tool warns: "Physiological baseline compromised. Risk of impulse error high." A qualified walking or standing break resets the DQP to 100%.

Regulatory Context: Break Mandates

EU Directive 90/270/EEC mandates that employers must plan display screen work so it is "periodically interrupted by breaks or changes of activity." While it doesn't specify exact durations, it establishes the legal right and employer obligation for structured breaks. In the U.S., OSHA guidelines are advisory rather than mandatory, focusing on ergonomics to prevent musculoskeletal disorders.

How the Kinetic Quotient Scoring Works

The Daily NEAT Score (DNS) is a composite metric from 0-100 combining four dimensions:

  • Volume Score (0-25): Total active work time, capped at 8 hours. Rewards productivity.
  • Frequency Score (0-30): Break compliance with non-linear decay. Perfect adherence to your work interval scores maximum; missed breaks compound rapidly.
  • Kinetic Score (0-30): Quality of breaks via self-report. Walking (+10 pts), standing (+5), stretching (+5), kitchen (+2), phone scrolling (-2). Post-lunch breaks receive a 1.5x chrono-metabolic multiplier.
  • Sedentary Penalty (0 to -15): Any continuous sitting exceeding 60 minutes triggers progressive deductions, reflecting LPL suppression onset.

Scoring 70+ daily maintains your Streak — a behavioral science mechanism leveraging Loss Aversion (the Duolingo/Zeigarnik model) to build long-term movement habits without requiring heroic willpower.

Key References

  • Levine JA. "Non-exercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT)." Mayo Clinic Proceedings.
  • Ekelund U et al. "Does physical activity attenuate the detrimental association of sitting time with mortality?" The Lancet (2016). N=1,000,000+.
  • Hamilton MT et al. "Role of low energy expenditure and sitting in obesity." Diabetes (2007). LPL suppression mechanism.
  • Peddie MC et al. "Breaking prolonged sitting reduces postprandial glycemia." Diabetes Care (2013).
  • Draugiem Group/DeskTime. Productivity analysis: 52-minute work / 17-minute break optimal rhythm.
  • Mackworth NH. "The breakdown of vigilance during prolonged visual search." (1948). Vigilance decrement.
  • NASA cognitive countermeasures. Cycling at 30% Wmax and reaction time improvement.
  • EU Directive 90/270/EEC. Display screen equipment: employer break obligations.